Environmental Press # 244

Subj: Trabuco Oaks: STOP saddle-xxx water scheme
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2003 13:26:40 -0700
From: Doug Korthof <doug@seal-beach.org>
To: voiceforveterans@aol.com (via SaveOaks@orange-county.net)

1. Defending Trabuco Oaks starts in Huntington Beach
2. Australia smarter than USA: protects Great Barrier Reef
3. Streisand's attack on Coastal Act gets "stupidity" award
4. Auto makers turn away Electric Car buyers, cling to dinosaur cars
----------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------
1. HUNTINGTON BEACH, TUES., JUNE 3, 7:00 P.M.
What does the Huntington Beach proposed "desalination plant" have to do with Trabuco Oaks? QUITE A LOT, as it turns out. The SaddleCreek development, among others, expects to get its water supplies from the Santa Marguerita Water District, a "water retailing" agency able to make deals with developers for new water requirements. But where will SMWD get it? San Diego, having not planned for the crisis, is in deep doo-doo, literally, without enough water to support their burgeoning population -- and without adequate sewage facilities to treat even to the secondary level (only a start at healing the Ocean). Los Angeles has no spare water. ENTER POSEIDON INDUSTRIES: water desalination mythology. The Ocean -- water

 

everywhere, but nothing to drink! But if sea water could be "desalinated" -- removal of the complex chemicals that make it unique and life giving -- that would be an endless supply of fresh water, and we could grow even more dense and put off the inevitable reckoning with common sense. Poseidon's Huntington Beach plant has the intent of being a water wholesaler -- they can sell to SMWD, but not directly to the developers of Saddlecreek, Saddleback meadows, RMV, etc. There are significant problems, in practice, that make desalination, in the opinion of some, a bogus scheme to bypass EIR protections. The desal plants in Santa Barbara and Catalina sit idle, despite the need for water, perhaps because of high operational cost. Other problems, such as the intake of basic ("phytoplankton") sea life and the output of "dead zones" that kill baby fish and the indigenous habitat, render it a seemingly obvious disaster and mistake.

Yet if the HB desal plant can get its "entitlements", or permits, BEFORE people notice it, they can claim that it will supply necessary "new" water to these vast new tracts. Whether or not desalination actually produces a drop of water here, or whether the plants would go bust and need Taxpayer rescue (reputedly the fate of the Florida plant) would be irrelevant -- the tracts would go in, the developers would sell out and move on to the next scheme.

So stopping the DESAL plant dead in its tracks here in Huntington Beach is IMPORTANT. The issue is up before the HB Planning Commission tomorrow, Tues, June 3, in an extraordinary meeting. They already held the "public hearing", so you will probably NOT be allowed to speak on the issue; but you can LOBBY THE PLANNING COMMISSIONERS, and hold up TACTFUL OCEAN OUTFALL GROUP SIGNS saying
NO TO POSEIDON
NO DESAL IN HB
This is probably the most important thing you can do, aside from writing or emailing the State Senate in support of SB754, Heritage Tree Preservation Act, that will protect hardwood trees with diameter greater than 28 inches. Leaving such trees alone in the so-called saddlecreek area would stop "cut and fill" grading, and force them to build among, and not damage, old trees (like the FTSP protective plan required!).

http://www.ci.huntington-beach.ca.us/citydepartments/planning/PJB/pc1/
Huntington Beach Planning Commission meets Tue., June 3. COME EARLY! The Commissioners need to hear about the huge public outcry that will ensue should this scabrous plot continue! Here is the Agenda:
http://www.ci.huntington-beach.ca.us/files/users/planning/PC060303.pdf

Directions: From Trabuco, go North on the 405 to Beach Blvd., go toward the Ocean to Main St. and make a right on to Main. Follow to 2000 Main St., SE corner of Main and Yorktown, the City Hall is to the left, across from the High School. Plenty of parking, the meeting is in the Council chamber outside down the steps from the police station entrance. From the Ocean, to up Main St. in HB to 2000 Main on the right.
----------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------
2. AUSTRALIA protects Reef from over-fishing, pollution Everyone in California acknowledges that fish stocks are depleted even compared to a "shifting baseline", but fishers want "everyone else" to stop, and senselessly fight endlessly against the only hope for recovery: Marine Protected areas. Now, Australia is the pathfinder, protecting vast parts of the Great Barrier Reef -- but is it in time, or is the damage, like the destruction of the California Coastline, irreversible?

"...Fishing will be banned from about one third of Australia's Great Barrier Reef under a draft rescue plan to save the world's largest living structure from human impact...record high temperatures, over-fishing and pollution..."But the expanded protection area only just meets scientists' estimates and environmentalists' demands that 30-50 percent of the...reef be declared a sanctuary..."The commercial fishing industry warned the plan could devastate fishing firms and small communities. 'More fishermen will be competing over fewer fish...'"
----------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------
3. Streisand goes from "beloved" to "besmirched" http://www.msnbc.com/news/920898.asp#BODY
Barbra Streisand wins STUPID HYPOCRITES "award" for lawsuit against Coastal Watchdog http://CaliforniaCoastline.org ( Ken Adelman )

Adelman, unlike thin spirits such as David Geffen and Barbra Streisand, actually backs his beliefs with actions to protect the Coast. Sure, Streisand, like Geffen, may write a check, but when it comes to their own privileges, they seem to think their transgressions are exempt
from public scrutiny.

"...Streisand has given hundreds of thousands of dollars over the years to help protect the environment. So, isn?t a suit like this just a bit hypocritical? The message of the lawsuit seems to be that protecting celebrities is a lot more important than protecting the environment. A lot of Hollywood stars would probably secretly agree to that, but in their image-conscious universe in which it's important to appear both beautiful and virtuous, no one except maybe Charlton Heston or Arnold Schwarzenegger would let themselves be caught implying that their interests come before the public...".

Contact Streisand through:
C/O Martin Erlichman Associates, Inc.
Tele 323-525-2555
5670 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 2400
Los Angeles, CA 90036

Adelman: "Our goal is to create a complete record of the California coastline...It is not possible...without the photographs of the coast that happen to include Ms Streisand's estate. We do not believe in...special treatment to wealthy coastal land owners."
------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------
4. "Take this dinosaur car and shove it..."
http://biz.yahoo.com/rb/030602/autos_chrysler_incentives_6.html
Until pollution from the oil economy is dealt with, cleaning up the air and water is not possible. Yet now, using solar rooftop power, it is possible (and fun) to commute and live mostly oil-free driving proven, successful Electric Vehicles. Of course "the Oilies" -- auto and oil companies -- want to cover this up, and the shameless Grey Davis killed the EV program in California to please them. Bush and Cheney, on the other hand, envision nuclear power ("nukes") as the clean energy source of the future, and plan hundreds of new nuclear plants to make the Hydrogen for their foolhardy "fuel cell" program. Are people fooled? USA people, yes, but not the foreign car companies like Toyota, which has the knowledge to make EVs when ever they wish. GM, Ford and Chrysler, meanwhile, having given away the crown of auto supremacy, now gloat in killing the EV program. They are also suffering from driver apathy and disinterest in boring old "dinosaur cars" that guzzle gas and produce oil emissions.

Chrysler, now captured by Muckity Benz, can't even GIVE it away!

"...Chrysler...[is] extending interest-free financing deals on most of its vehicles through Sept. 2, a move designed to halt a decline in its U.S. market share. "The zero-percent loans, for up to 60 months...[are part of] its single largest national sales program ever...dubbed the 'Summer Sales Drive'...". TAKE THE PLEDGE: UNTIL EVIL CAR COMPANIES OFFER ELECTRIC CARS AGAIN, "TAKE YER DINO CAR AN' SHOVE IT!". GM is confiscating and destroying our EV1 autos, refusing to let us release them or buy them, and will break them up for junk to hide the evidence that clean EVs are great cars -- and use such little energy you can power them from a solar rooftop system. Our EV1 goes 80 miles on the energy equivalent of a half gallon of gas -- and with NO OIL, NO SMOG CHECKS, NO GASO! And no wonder why the Oilies want to kill the idea.
http://DrivingTheFuture.com
http://EV1.org
http://HondaEV.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------

/Doug
714-496-1567

Back to T.O.C. 3